The emergence of a post-orange economic development model in Ukraine?

Authors

  • A. Swain University of Nottingham

Keywords:

development model, Washington consensus, austerity, developmental state, Ukraine, European Union, Russia

Abstract

This article analyzes the peculiarities of the emergence of a post-orange economic development model in Ukraine when the global financial crisis rebalanced political forces away in Ukraine from ‘orange’ parties which favoured the Washington consensus and a pro-western foreign policy towards so-called ‘blue and white’ forces, led by PRU, which represented national capital and favoured a more constructive relationship with Russia. The paper argues that Ukraine’s geopolitical location, in which the west and Russia compete with each other for influence, will ensure that the country’s path of development will likely remain conflicted. The paper concludes that first, some fiscal consolidation and reallocation is required to create either an entrepreneurial or a developmental state; and second, whilst emotion and soft power pulls Ukraine westwards hard calculation should make it look to Eurasia too.

Author Biography

A. Swain, University of Nottingham

Doctor, Associate Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Geography

References

Bojcun, M. (2011b). "The international economic crisis and the 2010 presidential elections in Ukraine." Journal of Communist and Transition Politics 27(3-4): 496-519

Connolly, R. and N. Copsey (2011). "The great slump of 2008-9 and Ukraine's integration with the European Union." Journal of Communist and Transition Politics 27(3-4): 541-565.

Dragneva, R. and K. Wolczuk (2012). Russia, the Eurasian Customs Union and the EU: Cooperation, stagnation or rivalry? Briefing Paper. London, Chatham House. http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Russia%20and%20Eurasia/0812bp_dragnevawolczuk.pdf 30/10/12

Eurasian Development Bank (2012). Ukraine and the Customs Union: Comprehensive assessment of the macroeconomic effects of various forms of deep economic integration of Ukraine and the member states of the Customs Union and Common Economic Space. St Petersburg, Eurasian Development Bank.

http://www.eabr.org/general/upload/reports/Ukraina_doklad_eng.pdf 30/10/12

Government of Ukraine (2010). Prosperous society, competitive economy, effective state. Kyiv, Government of Ukraine. http://www.usubc.org/site/files/Ukraine_Program_of_Economic_Reforms_2010-2014.pdf [unofficial translation] 26/10/12

IMF (2010). Request for Stand-By Arrangement and Cancellation of Current Arrangement. Washington DC, IMF. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2010/cr10262.pdf 29/10/12

Kholod, N. (2012). Reforming the Ukrainian economy under Yanukovych: The first two years. Washington DC, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. http://carnegieendowment.org/2012/04/02/reforming-ukrainian-economy-under-yanukovych-first-two-years/a63h# 24/10/12

Mykhnenko, V. and A. Swain (2010). "Ukraine’s diverging space-economy: The Orange Revolution, Post-Soviet development models and regional trajectories." European Urban and Regional Studies 17(2): 141-165.

Sadowski, R. (2012). The prospects for the EU-Ukraine free trade agreement. Warsaw, Centre for Eastern Studies.

http://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2012-10-18/prospects-euukraine-free-trade-agreement 24/10/12

Varga, M. (2012). "'Working class heresies': Ideology in protests of Ukrainian workers during the world economic crisis." Mimeo.

World Bank (2010). Ukraine country economic memorandum: Strategic choices to accelerate and sustain growth. Washington DC, World Bank.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles