Georgia’s Foreign Direct Investment Policy in the Process of Moving towards the EU
Keywords:
FDI, FDI policy, convergence to the EUAbstract
FDI flows provide capital, as well as technology and know-how and represent one of the most effective ways for integration with the global economy. Therefore the development of the appropriate policy measures to attract FDI is one of the important policy making areas in Georgia. The article analyzes Georgia’s FDI policy instruments using the conceptual framework of the UNCTAD, which distinguishes three generations of FDI policy instruments. During the last decades Georgia has made substantial reforms in the regulating institutions of the economy, including in the field of investments. At the present stage the most important objective is to carry out an effective strategy for economic and regulatory approximation with the EU. Implementation of the first generation of investment policy instruments in Georgia involved liberalization of trade and creation of the legislative basis for the open and non-discriminatory regime for foreign investors. Establishment of the Georgian National Investment Agency and Co-investment Fund were important second generation policy measures. Finally, Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) as a completely new dimension of Georgia-EU economic relations is helpful to put FDI policy within the broad economic strategy and policy context.References
Cohen S., Multinational Corporations And Foreign Direct Investment. Avoiding Simplicity, Embracing Complexity. Oxford University Press, 2007
Current Trade Regime of Georgia. Seminar On EU-Georgia Trade Issues Business Council Tbilisi, July 18, 2006
Does economic convergence with theEuropean Union mean more FDI ows toan economy? Analysis on 5 Central and Eastern Europe countries Ileana Alexe and Cristina F. Tatomir Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, October 2011
Frank L. Bartels, S. A. de Crombrugghe. FDI Policy Instruments: Advantages and Disadvantages. United nations industrial development organization, Vienna, 2009
Fulfillment of Obligations under European Neighborhood Policy in Georgia in 2012, Euro-Asia Cooperation Fund, Tbilisi, 2013
Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2009: Progress Report Georgia, EC, Brussels, 2009
Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2009: Progress Report Georgia, EC, Brussels, 2010
Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2009: Progress Report Georgia, EC, Brussels, 2011
Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2009: Progress Report Georgia, EC, Brussels, 2012
Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in Georgia Progress in 2012 and recommendations for action, European Commission, Brussels, 2013
Kaditi. E. A. Foreign Investments and Institutional Convergence in South eastern Europe, LICOS Discussion Paper Series Discussion Paper 260/2010
Kokiauri L., Georgia’s Investment prospects, Business Herald, 2008 №1(2)
Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment in support of negotiations of a DCFTA between the EU and Georgia and the Republic of Moldova, European Commission, Rotterdam, 2012
Foreign Direct Investment in the European Union EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation, Tokyo, 15 July 2010
The Role of Foreign Direct Investment and Trade Policies in Poland's Accession to the European Union World Bank Technical Paper NO. 442, World Bank, 1999
Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment in support of negotiations of a DCFTA between the EU and Georgia and the Republic of Moldova, CASE, ECORYS, Rotterdam, 2012
World Investment Report 2002: Transnational Corporations and Export Competitiveness, Geneva: UNCTAD. 2002
http://www.eucentre.sg/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/LisbonImpactonTrade-rev6Mar.pdf